Ovida gives mentors feedback on how they explore a person’s goals, offer advice and agree next steps. Review a real conversation or rehearse with AI, then choose a skill to develop.
Why the results disappoint
The largest review of the evidence pooled 112 studies across youth, academic and workplace mentoring. Mentoring came out favorably associated with almost everything it was tested against, and the size of every one of those associations was small. The authors caution practitioners directly against overestimating what mentoring on its own will do.
studies pooled, across 116 independent samples
of those samples were workplace mentoring specifically
magnitude of every favorable association found
Sources: Eby et al., Does Mentoring Matter? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2008
Why it is harder than it looks
The instinct of an experienced person is to solve it. Often the mentee has not finished working out what the problem is, and the answer lands on the wrong question.
Ovida flags the moments you moved to advice early, so you can see the pattern rather than be told about it.
The more senior you are, the less honest feedback you get about your own conversations. People manage upwards, and the mentee is the least likely person in the building to tell you it did not help.
You get a measured read on your own behavior, not a colleague’s opinion, tied to the moments that produced it.
Delegation, supervision and knowing when to step back are treated as things you pick up. Most leaders are handed people to develop without ever being shown how, and then judged on the result.
The same behaviors are scored the same way over time, so getting better at this stops being guesswork.
Whether you held the question open long enough. Whether the experience you shared was relevant to their situation or to yours. Whether you checked what they took away. These are observable behaviors. Ovida assesses them against the leadership framework your organization already holds people to, and points every score back at the moment that earned it.
Mentoring behaviors
When you can see how your mentoring conversations actually go, you stop spending your best hours on the people who are easiest to help and start reaching the ones who need it.
More people developed, same hoursBreaking a complex task down, checking someone has understood it, and following up without taking it back are supervision skills whatever you call them, and they are measurable in the same way.
Delegation that actually holdsThe part of leadership people remember at the end of a career is the people they helped become good. This makes that deliberate rather than accidental.
Careers you helped buildEveryone remembers a good mentor. Almost nobody is taught how to be one.
The more senior you are, the less honest feedback you get about your own conversations. The mentee is the least likely person in the building to tell you it did not help.
Mentoring is how experience moves through an organization, and it is almost entirely unmanaged. Making it visible is what turns it from a set of goodwill relationships into something that can be relied on.
Not to a different one the mentor found easier to answer. The difference between a mentor who solved it for you and one who helped you solve it is the difference you remember a decade later.
What Ovida measures, how the scoring is checked, what happens to your data, and the questions people ask about mentoring.
Read the FAQsMentoring and supervision in professional coaching is a defined practice with its own requirements. If you are a mentor coach or a supervisor working towards ICF accreditation, that has its own page.
ICF mentoring and supervisionThe other pillars of leadership
All of Strategic LeadershipNo confidential recording needed. We will walk you through a sample.